Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) converters are widely used in solar energy systems to maximize power extraction from photovoltaic panels.
One of the most important magnetic components in an MPPT converter is the power inductor.
In this example, we will walk through the design process for an MPPT inductor used in a 48V battery charging system.
The objective is to demonstrate the engineering workflow used when selecting and optimizing a practical magnetic design.

Design Requirements
Solar Panel Voltage:
30V to 80V
Battery Voltage:
48V
Output Power:
1500W
Switching Frequency:
100 kHz
Target Ripple Current:
25%
Maximum Temperature Rise:
40°C
Quick Design Estimate
Before detailed calculations, engineers often evaluate candidate magnetic solutions.
[solidmag_quick_estimator]
Step 1: Determine Output Current
Output current:
1500W ÷ 48V
≈ 31A
This establishes the primary current requirement.
Step 2: Select Ripple Current
A common design target is:
20–30% ripple current.
For this example:
25% ripple current
Ripple current target:
31A × 0.25
≈ 7.8A
Calculate Ripple Current
[solidmag_ripple_calculator]
Why Ripple Current Matters
Ripple current affects:
- Peak current
- RMS current
- Copper losses
- Temperature rise
- Saturation margin
👉 Related Guide: Ripple Current Explained
Step 3: Calculate Peak Current
Peak current becomes:
31A + (7.8A ÷ 2)
≈ 35A
This value is used for saturation analysis.
Step 4: Verify Saturation Margin
The magnetic design must remain below saturation at:
- Maximum power
- Worst-case solar conditions
- Elevated temperatures
👉 Related Guide: Understanding Magnetic Saturation
Check Saturation Margin
[solidmag_saturation_checker]
Step 5: Select Core Material
Potential candidates include:
- Ferrite
- Powdered Iron
- Nanocrystalline
For a 100 kHz MPPT converter:
Ferrite is often preferred because of:
- Low losses
- Good efficiency
- Broad availability
👉 Related Guide: How to Choose the Right Core Material
Step 6: Determine Wire Size
The winding must safely carry:
31A average current
while minimizing losses.
Possible options:
- AWG10
- AWG9
- Parallel conductors
- Copper foil
Evaluate Wire Options
[solidmag_wire_calculator]
Step 7: Estimate Losses
Major losses include:
- Copper losses
- Core losses
- AC winding losses
Reducing losses improves:
- Efficiency
- Battery charging performance
- Reliability
Estimate Losses
[solidmag_loss_estimator]
Step 8: Evaluate Thermal Performance
The design target is:
Less than 40°C temperature rise
under worst-case operating conditions.
👉 Related Guide: How to Reduce Inductor Temperature Rise
Thermal analysis should always accompany magnetic design.
Step 9: Compare Candidate Cores
Engineers often evaluate:
- ETD34
- ETD39
- PQ35
- PQ40
Tradeoffs include:
- Size
- Cost
- Losses
- Thermal performance
Multiple iterations are typically required.
Practical Optimization Process
A real MPPT magnetic design may evaluate:
- Multiple inductance values
- Multiple core families
- Different conductor arrangements
- Thermal performance
- Manufacturability
before selecting a final design.
Conclusion
Solar MPPT inductors must balance:
- Efficiency
- Saturation margin
- Temperature rise
- Cost
- Manufacturability
A systematic design approach helps engineers create reliable and efficient renewable energy systems.
Need Help Designing Solar Magnetics?
The SolidMagnetics platform helps engineers optimize:
- Core selection
- Saturation margin
- Wire sizing
- Thermal performance
- Manufacturability
while automatically generating CAD models, engineering drawings, BOMs, and production-ready outputs.
Ready to Generate Your Custom Magnetic Design?
Upload your electrical requirements and receive:
- 3D CAD model
- Manufacturing drawings
- BOM
- Build-ready geometry