Everything you need to know about professional magnetic component design.
Beginner → Advanced
15 Chapters
100+ Illustrations
Engineering Design Examples
Interactive Calculators
Free

Introduction
Whenever a magnetic component operates with a changing magnetic field, energy is lost within the core material itself.
These losses are known as core losses.
Unlike copper losses, which occur in the winding conductors, core losses occur directly inside the magnetic material.
Core losses convert electrical energy into heat and can significantly affect:
- Efficiency
- Temperature rise
- Reliability
- Maximum operating frequency
Understanding core losses is essential when designing inductors and transformers for switching power supplies.
What Causes Core Losses?
Core losses occur because magnetic materials are not perfectly efficient.
As magnetic flux repeatedly increases and decreases, the magnetic domains inside the material must continually realign themselves.
This process consumes energy.
Core losses are generally divided into two primary categories:
- Hysteresis Loss
- Eddy Current Loss
The total core loss is approximately the sum of these two mechanisms.
Hysteresis Loss
Magnetic materials contain millions of microscopic magnetic domains.
When a magnetic field is applied, these domains attempt to align with the field.
As the field changes direction, the domains must repeatedly rotate and realign.
This process is not perfectly efficient.
The energy required to continually move these domains appears as heat.
Understanding the B-H Curve
The relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic flux density is represented by a B-H curve.
The area enclosed by the B-H loop represents energy lost during each magnetic cycle.
The larger the loop area:
- The greater the hysteresis loss
- The more heat generated
- The lower the efficiency
Magnetic materials with narrow B-H loops generally exhibit lower core losses.
Hysteresis Loss Factors
Hysteresis losses increase with:
Frequency
More magnetic cycles occur every second.
Flux Density
Larger magnetic swings require more domain movement.
Material Selection
Different materials exhibit different hysteresis characteristics.
Ferrites generally have much lower hysteresis losses than silicon steel at high frequencies.
Eddy Current Loss
A changing magnetic field induces voltage inside conductive materials.
This voltage creates circulating currents within the core.
These circulating currents are called:
Eddy Currents
Eddy currents produce resistive heating inside the magnetic material.
Just like current flowing through a wire, these currents generate heat and waste energy.
Why Eddy Currents Occur
According to Faraday’s Law, changing magnetic flux induces voltage.
Although this equation is normally used to describe transformer action, the same principle creates unwanted voltages within the core material itself.
These induced voltages drive eddy currents.
Reducing Eddy Current Losses
Engineers use several methods to reduce eddy currents.
Ferrite Materials
Ferrites possess extremely high electrical resistance.
This resistance greatly limits eddy current flow.
This is one reason ferrites dominate modern switching power supplies.
Laminated Steel
Low-frequency transformers often use thin laminated steel sheets.
The laminations interrupt the current paths and dramatically reduce eddy currents.
Powdered Materials
Powdered iron and similar materials consist of insulated particles.
These particles naturally limit eddy current formation.
Frequency and Core Losses
Core losses increase rapidly with frequency.
As switching frequency rises:
- More magnetic cycles occur
- Hysteresis losses increase
- Eddy current losses increase
This is why magnetic material selection becomes increasingly important at higher frequencies.
A material that performs well at 20 kHz may perform poorly at 500 kHz.
Flux Density and Core Losses
Core losses also increase rapidly with flux density.
Flux density is:
As flux density increases:
- Domain movement increases
- Hysteresis loss rises
- Eddy current loss rises
- Temperature rise increases
Operating near saturation often causes losses to increase dramatically.
The Steinmetz Equation
Manufacturers commonly use the Steinmetz Equation to estimate core losses.
Where:
- Pcv = Core loss per unit volume
- K = Material constant
- f = Frequency
- Bmax = Peak Flux Density
- α = Frequency exponent
- β = Flux density exponent
The values of K, α, and β are provided by the material manufacturer.
The equation allows engineers to estimate losses before building hardware.
Comparing Common Core Materials
Manganese Zinc Ferrite (MnZn)
Advantages:
- Very low losses
- Excellent high-frequency performance
- Most common power ferrite
Typical Range:
- 20 kHz to several MHz
Nickel Zinc Ferrite (NiZn)
Advantages:
- Lower losses at very high frequencies
- Excellent EMI applications
Typical Range:
- Hundreds of kilohertz to tens of megahertz
Powdered Iron
Advantages:
- Distributed air gap
- Good DC bias capability
Disadvantages:
- Higher losses than ferrite
Typical Range:
- Below approximately 1 MHz
Amorphous Materials
Advantages:
- Extremely low hysteresis loss
- Excellent efficiency
Disadvantages:
- Higher cost
Silicon Steel
Advantages:
- Excellent at line frequency
Disadvantages:
- Excessive losses at switching frequencies
Typical Range:
- 50 Hz to several kilohertz
Core Loss and Temperature Rise
Core losses appear directly as heat.
Higher core losses produce:
- Higher temperatures
- Lower efficiency
- Reduced reliability
A design that looks electrically correct may still fail because excessive core losses create unacceptable temperatures.
Thermal analysis should always include both:
- Core losses
- Copper losses
How Designers Minimize Core Losses
Engineers commonly reduce core losses by:
Lowering Flux Density
Operate farther from saturation.
Selecting Better Materials
Choose materials optimized for the operating frequency.
Reducing Frequency
Lower frequency reduces magnetic cycling losses.
Increasing Core Size
A larger core often reduces flux density.
Reviewing Manufacturer Loss Curves
Core manufacturers provide loss curves that should always be consulted during design.
SolidMag Engineering Note
Lowest Loss Does Not Always Mean Best Design
Many engineers focus exclusively on minimizing core losses.
However, reducing core loss often requires:
- Larger cores
- More copper
- Increased cost
The best design is rarely the one with the absolute lowest loss.
Instead, successful magnetic design balances:
- Efficiency
- Temperature rise
- Size
- Cost
- Manufacturability
The goal is optimization, not perfection.
What You’ve Learned
In this chapter you learned:
- What core losses are
- The difference between hysteresis and eddy current losses
- Why B-H loop area affects energy loss
- How frequency influences core losses
- Why flux density affects efficiency
- How the Steinmetz Equation estimates losses
- The strengths and weaknesses of common magnetic materials
- Practical methods for reducing core losses
Continue Reading
Chapter 11: Understanding Copper Losses
Core losses are only one source of heat within a magnetic component. In the next chapter, we will examine copper losses, DC resistance, AC resistance, skin effect, proximity effect, and how conductor selection influences efficiency and temperature rise.
SolidMag Engineering Note
Why Ferrite Dominates Switching Power Supplies
Ferrite materials combine high magnetic permeability with extremely high electrical resistance. This unique combination minimizes eddy current losses while providing efficient magnetic coupling, making ferrites the preferred material for most modern switching power supplies operating from tens of kilohertz to several megahertz.
Ready to Generate Your Custom Magnetic Design?
Upload your electrical requirements and receive:
- 3D CAD model
- Manufacturing drawings
- BOM
- Build-ready geometry